Research project

Missing Cases in China’s Courts

Measuring the gap between the cases Chinese courts hear and the judgments the public can actually see.

Line chart comparing national court caseloads with judgment documents published online from 2010 through 2024
Figure 1. Court caseloads and publicly available judgments, 2010–2024

Public records reveal the courts. Their absences reveal something, too.

China Judgments Online became one of the world’s largest public collections of court records. But courts vary enormously in what they upload—and since 2021, whole categories of cases have disappeared.

This project estimates what is missing, where, and when, creating a court-by-court view of judicial transparency across China.

01140M+

judgment records analyzed

023,638

courts represented nationwide

0310 years

of court-level estimates

043 types

civil, criminal and administrative

Case numbers leave a trail.

Chinese courts assign cases sequential numbers. Even when only a portion of judgments are public, the range and distribution of those numbers lets researchers estimate the full caseload.

The logic echoes the “German Tank Problem”: a statistical method originally used to estimate wartime production from observed serial numbers.

See the estimates in the portal ↗

Observed case numbers

001002004 006007 010011
Observed7 Estimated total12
Illustrative sequence

Transparency is uneven—and moving backward.

Three patterns emerge from the national court-level estimates.

01 / Case type
Availability rates for civil, administrative, and criminal cases
Figure 3. Availability by case type

Not every kind of case is equally visible.

Criminal cases have historically been more available than administrative or civil cases.

02 / Region
Map showing aggregate court case availability across China
Figure 4. Aggregate transparency across China

Geography shapes the public record.

Many coastal provinces disclose a larger share of judgments than courts in western regions.

03 / Time
Box plots showing court case availability by year from 2013 through 2022
Figure 5. Case availability over time

The window narrowed after 2021.

Public availability declined substantially after years of expanding access.

Project Team Members

A collaboration among scholars at Columbia University, UC Berkeley, and UC San Diego.

Where are court records available—and where are the gaps?

Filter by province, court, year, and case type. Compare estimated caseloads with the judgments disclosed online.

Launch the court case portal

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt

Start typing and press Enter to search